Wikipedia
Wikimedia Foundation
Government orders to act against illegal content
Article 15(1)(a)
No government orders reported, or all categories reported zero.
Notices received from users and flaggers
Article 16
Own-initiative moderation
Article 15(1)(c) and (d)
Account-level actions
Article 15(1)(d)
| Account suspensions | 0 |
|---|---|
| Account terminations | 0 |
| Total account actions | 0 |
In Wikipedia's words
Wikipedia's long-form answers to the standard qualitative questions every platform must answer (Article 42 of the DSA). How it moderates content, how it measures accuracy, how its teams are resourced. Its own words. Expand each to read. (Short notes pinned to individual figures are under "Footnotes from Wikipedia" below.)
High-level description of the content moderation governance structure
Meaningful and comprehensible information regarding content moderation engaged in at the providers' own initiative
Methodology used to compute the number of human resources dedicated to content moderation
Qualifications of the human resources dedicated to content moderation
Qualitative description of indicators of accuracy and possible rate of error of automated means
Qualitative description of the automated means
Safeguards applied to the use of automated means
Specification of the precise purposes to apply automated means
Summary of the content moderation engaged in at the providers’ own initiative
Support given to human resources dedicated to content moderation
Training given to human resources dedicated to content moderation
Raw data
Every figure on this page comes from Wikipedia's filing as loaded into RTFP's public database. You can query the underlying data directly via thepublic API. The original filing is linked from thesources page.
Footnotes from Wikipedia
Short notes Wikipedia pinned to specific figures in its filing. Definitions, clarifications and corrections written against individual numbers, shown verbatim. (For its longer descriptions of how it moderates, see "In Wikipedia's words" above.)
Show 8 notes
Article 16 notices
- Actions on the basis of termsDuring this cycle, the Foundation implemented 1 Office Action from the notices received. The remaining notices were referred to the community.
- Median time to actionNotices often relate to a much broader allegation of policy-violating behaviour that is carefully investigated by our Trust & Safety team. Thorough investigations into complex matters can require several weeks, particularly when ongoing monitoring of a situation and/or coordination with the volunteer community is required.
- Notices receivedThere are a small number of notices brought to the Foundation's attention through official mechanisms, though they are more appropriately for and actioned by the community under their own policies (typically as an editorial or courtesy matter).
Complaints, appeals & disputes
- Number of complaints submitted to the internal-complaints mechanismThere were zero eligible EU complaints submitted to the internal complaints-handling mechanism during this reporting period.
- Number of disputes submitted to out-of-court dispute settlement bodiesThe dispute is pending as of this report's publication.
Government orders
- Article 10: median time to give effectThis related to a court order in complex ongoing civil proceedings, leading to a skewed/ un-representative "median time"
Own-initiative (illegal content)
- Measures (total)WMF removes CSAM (detected by PhotoDNA) at its own iitiative, and we treat this as a violation of our terms and conditions (reported on tab 6). Moreover, this is not an EU-specific measure, therefore it is not reported in this EU-specific transparency report.
Own-initiative (terms of service)
- Measures (total)WMF removes CSAM (detected by PhotoDNA) at its own iitiative. However, as this is not an EU-specific measure, it is not reported in this EU-specific transparency report.
RTFP notes
RTFP's own observations about comparability and data gaps for Wikipedia, not statements from Wikipedia. Where Wikipedia itself commented, that appears under "Footnotes from Wikipedia" above.
- ComparabilityWikipedia's reported moderator headcount counts only paid Wikimedia Foundation staff. The volunteer editor community, which carries out the large majority of day-to-day moderation, is not included. The figure therefore understates the number of people moderating the platform and is not comparable to platforms that employ their moderators directly.